<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title type="text">tspore.com</title>
  <generator uri="http://effectif.com/nesta">Nesta</generator>
  <id>tag:tspore.com,2009:/</id>
  <link href="http://tspore.com/articles.xml" rel="self"/>
  <link href="http://tspore.com" rel="alternate"/>
  <subtitle type="text">A Black &amp; White Blog About The Grey Things in Life</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <title>Children's Dental Group </title>
    <link href="http://tspore.com/projects/Childrens-Dental-Group" type="text/html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:tspore.com,2010-03-17:/projects/Childrens-Dental-Group</id>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Spaceshipdentist, is a massive beast that they wanted to convert to a CMS. This has lead to 11 different domain names all posting to various pages. We have used Modxcms, to manage this project, and really has come out very well. A lot of SEO work performed by someone else has been done, so we had to match page titles, create 65+ 301 redirects, etc. All in all I think that both the client and our team is very proud of this site.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;a href='attachments/projects/cdg.jpg' rel='lightbox[projects]'&gt; &lt;img alt='' name='' src='attachments/projects/s-cdg.jpg' width='125' /&gt; &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href='attachments/projects/cdg.jpg' rel='lightbox[projects]'&gt;image 2 &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href='attachments/projects/cdg3.jpg' rel='lightbox[projects]'&gt;image 3 &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href='attachments/projects/cdg2.jpg' rel='lightbox[projects]'&gt;image 4 &lt;/a&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href='http://spaceshipdentist.com'&gt;Spaceshipdentist&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content>
    <published>2010-03-17T00:00:00+00:00</published>
    <category term="projects"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Fillmore Paragliding Launch</title>
    <link href="http://tspore.com/pano/Fillmore-Hills" type="text/html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:tspore.com,2010-03-07:/pano/Fillmore-Hills</id>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;The Fillmore Paragliding launch is a beautiful place which overlooks the valley. Overall I really enjoy the 10 minute drive to the top to see the valley. It was a bit overcast on the day of this shot, but still it is quite a beautiful place to live. On a clear day you can see the islands. &lt;img alt='Paragliding Launch' src='http://photos.allplaces.net/photos/501616095_wTZUS-M.jpg' /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;script language='JavaScript' type='text/javascript'&gt;
    embedquicktime( "/images/panos/paragliding.mov", 400, 316, "true" );
&lt;/script&gt;</content>
    <published>2010-03-07T00:00:00+00:00</published>
    <category term="pano"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Fillmore City Hall</title>
    <link href="http://tspore.com/pano/Fillmore-City-Hall" type="text/html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:tspore.com,2010-03-06:/pano/Fillmore-City-Hall</id>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;To get this entire scene I had to use the 8mm fisheye. I have never been a huge Fisheye fan, but to tell you the truth in this case it was a life saver. I tried with the 7mm-14mm but I couldn&amp;#8217;t get the whole shot.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Also the City hall is as far as I can tell the tallest building in town. Unwrapped the shot is ok, but I think that the movie is very pleasant to look at. Really I could spend all day looking at these pictures. The biggest disadvantage, was I didn&amp;#8217;t quite get the pavement 100% with the lines. But I wasn&amp;#8217;t doing this for a client, so I only did it once. (Also you can see me in the reflection.)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt='Fillmore City Hall' src='http://photos.allplaces.net/photos/499567474_hd5N4-M.jpg' /&gt; &lt;script language='JavaScript' type='text/javascript'&gt;
    embedquicktime( "/images/panos/Cityhall.mov", 400, 316, "true" );
&lt;/script&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content>
    <published>2010-03-06T00:00:00+00:00</published>
    <category term="pano"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Fish Hatchery </title>
    <link href="http://tspore.com/pano/fish-Hatchery" type="text/html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:tspore.com,2010-03-05:/pano/fish-Hatchery</id>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;The Fillmore Fish Hatchery, is one of my boys most favorite places to visit. Lot&amp;#8217;s of fish, birds, and room to run makes it a frequent visiting place for us. Really I think I like the photo more than the video but all it all I think they both work. I don&amp;#8217;t know how it happened but their are a few odd bright spots in the photo. The peeling of a 360 degree photo with a straight road is neat to look at too. &lt;img alt='fillmore fish hatchery' src='http://photos.allplaces.net/photos/498174598_WhcvN-M.jpg' /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;script language='JavaScript' type='text/javascript'&gt;
    embedquicktime( "/images/panos/fish-hatch3.mov", 400, 316, "true" );
&lt;/script&gt;</content>
    <published>2010-03-05T00:00:00+00:00</published>
    <category term="pano"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Casey's room. </title>
    <link href="http://tspore.com/pano/caseyroom" type="text/html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:tspore.com,2010-03-04:/pano/caseyroom</id>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;This was my first attempt with my current &lt;a href='equipment'&gt;Equipment&lt;/a&gt; setup last year. I waited till the light in the room was nearly perfect. But after the first set of shots, I had to use the internal light, so its still good but not perfect -&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img alt='Caseys Room' src='http://photos.allplaces.net/photos/493727286_w3TuV-S.jpg' /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This shot wasn&amp;#8217;t really thought of to be used as a movie, until I assembled it, but I didn&amp;#8217;t have a image of the floor So the next morning I shot the scene over again. All in all It is a beautiful photo, just have to crop off some floor, and I would be proud to show it off.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The next day I did shoot the same scene with a top and bottom picture so that I could make a 360 degree movie out of it, but the lighting wasn&amp;#8217;t as good.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img alt='Caseys Room2' src='http://photos.allplaces.net/photos/494101036_koZxu-S.jpg' /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Really the lesson here is know what you want to do with a photo before you take the picture. (Of course I could always crop down the 2nd one for a print if I wanted too).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Below is the first attempt, not bad for a first attempt, with new equipment. But I think I am going to like this rig.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;script language='JavaScript' type='text/javascript'&gt;
    embedquicktime( "/images/panos/CaseyRoom2.mov", 400, 316, "true" );
&lt;/script&gt;</content>
    <published>2010-03-04T00:00:00+00:00</published>
    <category term="pano"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Equipment</title>
    <link href="http://tspore.com/pano/equipment" type="text/html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:tspore.com,2010-03-03:/pano/equipment</id>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Here is my basic equipment that I use to make these shots.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2 id='lenses_and_cameras'&gt;Lenses and Cameras&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;First let me say this I am a 4/3 SLR user. I personally love the system, so much that I started &lt;a href='http://fourthirdsphoto.com'&gt;fourthirdsphoto.com&lt;/a&gt; . With that said I have basically 2 lenses that I use to create 360 degree panos - the 7-14mm, and the 8mm fisheye. The rectangular 7-14mm is probably the highest quality ultra wide angle lens I have ever owned. I have so little work to do with the images even at 7mm (35mm equiv. 14mm), that it is a no brainer to use. The 8mm fish eye too is a very fine quality lens, but I usually reserve it for very tight quarters such as the back door shot of the city hall. You can use any 4/3 slr but I usually use the E-30 or E-3. I am still waiting to try out the Micro 4/3 version of the 9-18mm but for overall perfection I prefer the 7-14mm.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2 id='tripod_and_heads'&gt;tripod and heads&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt='Acratech - GP Ballhead, Nodal Rails, L bracket' src='http://photos.allplaces.net/photos/802589315_7GDP7-M.jpg' /&gt; Overall I have a Carbon Fiber tripod, but any high quality tripod will work. But for a head I have been using Acratech&amp;#8217;s products for years. They are top notch, and makes creating a Pano simple. The 3 products are - the GP ballhead, L Bracket, and the Nodal rail. The GP ballhead can be turned upside down - to provide a level base (This change takes about 1 minute - Beat that with any other system)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The Nodal rail, and L-Backet, allow 2 important features for 360 degree panos. #1 - lets you place the camera vertically with the L bracket. Which allows you to pull in most of the field of view. #2 - the Nodal rail let&amp;#8217;s you run the nodal point, basically the optic center of the lens above the pivot point. To have a balanced photo.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The equipment is light, and compact. It is quick to setup, and travels well. Really this is the best pano system I have found any where.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2 id='software'&gt;Software&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I use Auto Desk Stitcher Unlimited to process the shots. It is expensive, but the best that I have found. I basically convert the shots to medium sized jpgs (about 1000px vertically) then use the software to automatically stitch them together.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Finally I use VR worx application or Cubic converter to make my final shots. All in all that is how I do it. A lot of software is involved, such as the raw converter in my case Aperture. Photoshop, if its a HDR - then that software, and then Stitcher, and finally either Cubic converter or vr worx. Really I prefer cubic converter over VR Worx - just because of simplicity.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;More info:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href='http://acratech.net/home.php?cat=1&amp;amp;bid=1&amp;amp;partner=fourthirdsphoto'&gt;Acratech&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href='http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001W3FX9M?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;tag=fourthirdspho-20&amp;amp;linkCode=as2&amp;amp;camp=1789&amp;amp;creative=390957&amp;amp;creativeASIN=B001W3FX9M'&gt;Autodesk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(I do receive a small amount of money from clicking on the links above.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href='http://www.clickheredesign.com.au/cubicconverter/'&gt;cubic converter&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content>
    <published>2010-03-03T00:00:00+00:00</published>
    <category term="pano"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Monitor Resolutions</title>
    <link href="http://tspore.com/SEO/Monitor-Resolution" type="text/html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:tspore.com,2010-02-23:/SEO/Monitor-Resolution</id>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Overall monitor resolutions have grown from 800 px wide to nearly all monitors have grown to at least 1154 x 864. Overall, I see no reason to build a website to at least 950 px wide. Below is the top 10 resolutions of monitors browsing my sites. &lt;br /&gt;Resolution - # of visitors&lt;br /&gt;1280 x 800 - 19140 &lt;br /&gt;1680 x 1050 - 19110&lt;br /&gt;1280 x 1024 - 1200 &lt;br /&gt;1920 x 1200 - 14650&lt;br /&gt;1024 x 768 - 14062 &lt;br /&gt;1440 x 900 - 13382&lt;br /&gt;1920 x 1080 - 3914&lt;br /&gt;1600 x 1200 - 3647&lt;br /&gt;1366 x 768 - 2805 &lt;br /&gt;1152 x 865 - 2213&lt;/p&gt;</content>
    <published>2010-02-23T00:00:00+00:00</published>
    <category term="SEO"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Mobile Browsers in 2010 </title>
    <link href="http://tspore.com/SEO/Mobile-Browsers-2010" type="text/html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:tspore.com,2010-02-22:/SEO/Mobile-Browsers-2010</id>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;As we talked about in &lt;a href='/SEO/Search-Bots'&gt;The Google Beast&lt;/a&gt; we attempt to focus our time around the 80 - 20 rule. These rules do change over time, but here is a prime example of that theory in practice. On a look of mobile viewer on one of our large sites we broke it down too 5 players in this market.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2 id='the_numbers'&gt;The Numbers&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We had over the last 30 days around 1,824 viewers who surfed the site. Of that group 1,600 used an apple device (e.g. 87%). 110 users (6%) used an Android based device. Only 69 users were on BlackBerry a small 3%, which was some what surprising to me. The last group each at less than 2% were Windows, PalmOS, and/or some other mobile device.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2 id='the_results'&gt;The Results&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;With this knowledge we have to ask ourselves so what does this mean? Basically how can we use the 80-20 rule? Both Android and mobile Safari are WebKit based browsers. This means we have a very robust device, which can use some very robust JS libraries, and CSS3, etc. So between Android, and iphone we have around 94% of the market.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Will the website look odd on a blackberry, maybe, but if we can grab 94% of the web, make it look very nice, then perhaps we can ignore the others. Or provide a simple view for that last 6%? Our friends at &lt;a href='http://www.aumnia.com/'&gt;Aumnia&lt;/a&gt; , really are doing some very advanced techniques to deal with mobile websites. If you want to learn more check out their site.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3 id='the_numbers'&gt;The Numbers&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Apple - 1,600 - 87.7%&lt;br /&gt;Android - 110 - 6%&lt;br /&gt;BlackBerry - 69 - 3.7%&lt;br /&gt;Windows - 13 - 0.7%&lt;br /&gt;PalmOS - 6 - 0.3%&lt;br /&gt;Other - 26 - 1.4%&lt;/p&gt;</content>
    <published>2010-02-22T00:00:00+00:00</published>
    <category term="SEO"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>M.GraniteCreek.org</title>
    <link href="http://tspore.com/projects/mobile-granite" type="text/html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:tspore.com,2010-02-17:/projects/mobile-granite</id>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt='M.Granitecreek.org' src='/attachments/projects/m-granitecreek.jpg' /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Well this was a last minute throw together for them. All in all we built it using jqtouch, and spent about a week or so on it. A few improvements, such as to get the calendar RSS feed to work (which is hosted by a 3rd party software solution) as well as add in a JS detect script which I haven&amp;#8217;t finalized my mind on. But they are very pleased.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2 id='what_it_should_do_'&gt;What it should do -&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Many people have a lot of ideas of how a mobile website should behave. Basically I am a minimalist, I would say for a retail business it should contain a phone number, and a address. For the church, we also wanted to print out the upcoming events. Finally we wanted to give it a good look.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So for a mobile site it needs functionality as a top priority too. We wanted it to be accessible as a full blown web application to be launched off your home screen. All in all we are quite proud of this. To see the video click &lt;a href='http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWz7sUoAAGQ'&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content>
    <published>2010-02-17T00:00:00+00:00</published>
    <category term="projects"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A Tutorial</title>
    <link href="http://tspore.com/Rails3/First-Application-in-Rails3" type="text/html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:tspore.com,2010-02-16:/Rails3/First-Application-in-Rails3</id>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Not a whole lot of information exists right now about Rails 3. Basically since I am building an application from scratch, I will run it with Ruby 1.9.1, and rails 3. If you are coming from rails 2.3.x than a few things have changed. I wanted to post a quick tutorial on how to get started.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h1 id='first_setup_your_project'&gt;First setup your project&lt;/h1&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you are running rvm (as I am make sure that you have loaded rails 3) see &lt;a href='/Rails3/RVM-and-Rails3'&gt;this post&lt;/a&gt; for more info. Since you have rails 3 loaded, which you can test with - rails -v and it should read something like - &lt;em&gt;Rails 3.0.0.beta&lt;/em&gt;, you can next run &lt;strong&gt;rails fish&lt;/strong&gt; which will create the rails3 directory structure. Next step into the directory &lt;strong&gt;cd fish&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2 id='second_add_in_haml'&gt;Second Add in HAML&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Rails 3 allows for many plugins but I have only test Haml to date. Instructions exist for this &lt;a href='http://github.com/psynix/rails3_haml_scaffold_generator'&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. One of the new features of Rails 3 is the new Gemfile.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;In this file you will need to add &lt;em&gt;gem &amp;#8220;haml&amp;#8221;&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/li&gt;

&lt;li&gt;next run - &lt;strong&gt;bundle install&lt;/strong&gt; - and it will load all the gems for the application&lt;/li&gt;

&lt;li&gt;Third run - &lt;strong&gt;haml &amp;#8212;rails .&lt;/strong&gt; to install the plugin.&lt;/li&gt;

&lt;li&gt;Fourth under config/application.rb add the following code:&lt;br /&gt;config.generators do |g|&lt;br /&gt; g.template_engine :haml&lt;br /&gt;end&lt;/li&gt;

&lt;li&gt;Next the git clone:&lt;br /&gt;git clone git://github.com/psynix/rails3_haml_scaffold_generator.git lib/generators/haml&lt;/li&gt;

&lt;li&gt;Finally we need to start running some applications.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;h2 id='building_the_application'&gt;Building the Application&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Now we have the basic&amp;#8217;s setup its time to see if it runs -&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;rails server&lt;/strong&gt; should start the server. Just to make sure that it all works correctly. Next we need to build in some scaffolding - Since we are building an application called fish let&amp;#8217;s make some types of fish. &lt;strong&gt;rails generate scaffold Minnow name:string size:integer color:string&lt;/strong&gt; for simplicity we only setup a few fields. After that is completed simply run &lt;strong&gt;rake db:migrate&lt;/strong&gt; and it should create the database and fields as are needed. again run &lt;strong&gt;rails server&lt;/strong&gt; to start the application navigate to: http://localhost:3000/minnows and you can add, show and remove all the little fish that you like.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3 id='generator'&gt;Generator&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Last is to note the Generator - &lt;strong&gt;rails generate&lt;/strong&gt; to know which commands you can do from the command line:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Rails:&lt;br /&gt; controller | generator | helper | integration_test | model_subclass | observer | performance_test | plugin | resource | scaffold | scaffold_controller session_migration | stylesheets |&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;ActiveRecord: active_record:migration | active_record:model | active_record:observer | active_record:session_migration |&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Erb: erb:controller | erb:mailer | erb:scaffold |&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Haml: haml:controller | haml:mailer | haml:scaffold |&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;TestUnit: test_unit:controller | test_unit:helper | test_unit:integration | test_unit:mailer | test_unit:model | test_unit:observer | test_unit:performance | test_unit:plugin | test_unit:scaffold |&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I really am liking Rails 3 - Just to have the modular architecture is quite nice.&lt;/p&gt;</content>
    <published>2010-02-16T00:00:00+00:00</published>
    <category term="Rails3"/>
  </entry>
</feed>

<!-- page cached: 2010-08-03 10:31:56 -->

